Today, I visited Grace Temple Ministries and the Associate Pastor Daryl Braden preached from Genesis 3:9-10,
"And Jehovah God called unto man, and said unto him, Where are you? And he said, I heard a voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself."
As I pondered this scripture and message it spoke to me and my heart was so heavy. During the service, a young woman walked in and sat besides me. She wore an over-sized puff car-coat. (
That's a throw back term) She had on jeans, a tight shirt that revealed she was pregnant. Her unstructured ponytail was telling me she was a young soul. The young man with her held her hand. I drew assumptions about her, as I am sure she had some about me.
We all have insecurities, and we sometimes hide behind them. We hide behind our earthly possessions, brand names, and what we consider the popular thing to do because we want to feel a part of the world. When God really wants us to be the
Salt of the Earth. We hide from our values, our beliefs for fear that some group will shun us. We hide from our own
sin because it is embarrassing to admit our imperfections. And when we hide, God asks the question,
"Where are you?"
During the alter call, the young woman beside me wiping her tears said,
"I am going to get what I came for..." She got up and went to pray. Before I knew it, I was at the alter, too. Her courage nudged me to admit that I needed to pray.
I don't know what God wants me to do with this passion for social justice, and it scares me. Because when you are truthful to power you are criticized and obstructed. For weeks, I have tried to avoid answering the question,
"Where Are You on the Sales Tax?"
But, I am here, probably alone. But, I am comfortable that it is where God led me.
I support Pre-K for all children. I do not support the referendum we are asked to vote for to fund it. Therefore, I will vote "No".
Why am I opposed to the sales tax referendum?
A tax with a rate that decreases as the taxpayer's income increases.
The result of a regressive tax is that the lower-income taxpayer pays a larger percentage of his or her income in taxes than does the higher-income taxpayer.
- It is a double down regressive tax.
Even though is it already a regressive tax, the provision of lowering property taxes of property owners makes it a double down regressive tax. The poor who rent will not get a reduction in rent, but the owner of the property will benefit from the poor's sacrifice. That makes this morally wrong for me.
- Public elected bodies should determine the spending of public funds.
Education is the responsibility of the State and County. Why are we building a new foundation to go around the public entity charged with that responsibility? Why would I want a handpicked boby making these decisions over an elected Board of Education with broad representation from every district in this city.
- I don't buy their ice water colder theory.
If we raise the public funds for the implementation of Pre-K, it should be the responsibility of our school
board that is charged with educating our children. The notion that we should have a select foundation because people don't trust our school system's leaders is a message that I do not care to send.
I have lived in a world all my life that because of my skin, my sex, my status, it was assumed that I could not make sound decisions. I reject that message. I don't think the proponents are trying to send that message, but we must be careful about subliminal messages. I have disagreed with decisions of the School Board but I trust that they are good stewards and want all our children to share the resources for their educational success.
The gains that have been made from hardworking board members, superintendents, administrators, teachers, parents and students should be applauded and I think they are capable of making a Pre-K plan for our children with funds from our public.
- As a city, the citizens decided to abolish the Memphis City School System, and now they want back in. This is confusing and a little schizophrenic.
- Is this plan constitutional?
If we know we will only have money for some members of the class and the need for Pre-K is greater can we really withhold Pre-K from some of the members of the class while allowing others to a service when the funds were generated from a tax from all citizens? Lawyers, please examine this.
So, where am I?
Here, I am God, probably alone, but at peace with this decision.
I am ashamed it took me so long to stand up and say it. I respect the will of the voters. I just regret that we are voting on this issue at a time when the turn out will be low. This is another political tactic that allows you to get your target voters who support the item to the polls while those who oppose with no funds to educate the public will stay home. These funding referendums should be placed on the ballot during a Mayoral election or a general election that is not a special election.
P.S.
By the way, to fund Pre-K, I suggest working with the new County leaders and tap the funds that are a part of the Pilot Program that should be directed toward public education. I read on Smart City that there may be approximately $10-12 million in that area and review the Motel/Hotel Tax. Surely, tourism and corporate understand the value in educating its future workforce.